[ From: Jagannath Chatterjee
[ Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006
Dear Members,
I have been warning against the use of serum based
vaccines and medicines. These products are almost always
contaminated and carry the risk of spreading dangerous
diseases. Medical insiders know that uncontaminated serum
is a contradiction in terms. Serum can only be
"relatively pure", whatever that means. The risk of
genetic contamination is 100% as we do not screen the
serum for defective genes.
Now we have a very large drug MNC showing no regrets
about passing on HIV to patients in Asia through a serum
based medication.
Regards,
Jagannath.
June 10, 2006
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/22/health/main555154.shtml
Bayer Sold HIV-Risky Meds
By David McHugh
The Associated Press
FRANKFURT, Germany, May 22, 2003
(AP)
Quote
"Decisions made nearly two decades ago were based on the
best scientific information of the time and were
consistent with the regulations in place. They cannot be
judged on the information available today." Bayer AG
(AP) Chemical and drug maker Bayer AG said Thursday it
acted "responsibly, ethically and humanely" during the
1980s in selling a blood-clotting product that stopped
potentially fatal bleeding in hemophiliacs but was linked
to the risk of HIV infection.
The company's statement was in response to a New York
Times report that it sold millions of dollars worth of an
older version of the medication in Latin America and Asia
while marketing a newer, safer product in the United
States and Europe.
Bayer division Cutter Biological continued selling old
stocks of the medicine for more than a year after it
introduced a version in February 1984 that was heat-
treated to kill HIV, according to documents obtained by
the Times.
The medicine, called Factor VIII concentrate, can stop or
prevent potentially fatal bleeding in people with
hemophilia, a genetic condition that prevents blood from
clotting normally.
Early in the AIDS epidemic, the medicine was made using
plasma from 10,000 or more donors. There was not yet a
screening test for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, so
even a small number of HIV-positive donors could taint a
large pool of plasma recipients.
As a result, thousands of hemophiliacs became infected
with HIV. Bayer and three other companies that made the
concentrate have paid about $600 million to settle more
than 15 years of lawsuits accusing them of making a
dangerous product, the newspaper said.
The Times said at least 100 hemophiliacs in Hong Kong and
Taiwan alone contracted AIDS after using the older
product, and that many have since died. Li Wei-chun said
her son, who died in 1996 at the age of 23, was among the
victims.
"They did not care about the lives in Asia," she said.
"It was racial discrimination."
Cutter also sold the older medicine in Argentina,
Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and Singapore after February
1984, according to the documents. The newspaper said
Cutter shipped more than 100,000 vials of unheated
concentrate, worth more than $4 million, after it began
selling the safer product.
The sales continued partly because of Cutter's desire to
deplete stocks of the older medicine, and partly because
of fixed-price contracts, for which the company believed
the older product would be cheaper to make, the newspaper
said.
In March 1983, the federal Centers for Disease Control
warned that blood products appeared responsible for AIDS
among hemophiliacs. Three months later, Cutter sent a
letter to distributors in nearly two dozen nations saying
that AIDS was "the center of irrational response in many
countries."
In late 1984, as Hong Kong hemophiliacs began testing
positive for HIV, some doctors wondered whether Cutter
was sending "AIDS-tainted" medicine into less-developed
nations.
But the company assured its distributor that the unheated
product posed "no severe hazard" and was the "same fine
product we have supplied for years."
In May 1985, Dr. Harry M. Meyer Jr., the Food and Drug
Administration's blood-products official, called the
companies to a meeting, believing they had broken an
agreement to stop selling the older medicine, the Times
said. But Meyer decided to handle the matter quietly
instead of notifying the public, the newspaper said.
A food allergy occurs when your immune system responds defensively to a specific food protein that is not harmful to the body.
The first time you eat the offending food, your immune system responds by creating specific disease-fighting antibodies (called immunoglobulin E or IgE). When you eat the food again, the IgE antibodies spring into action, releasing large amounts of histamine in an effort to expel the "foreign invader" from your body. Histamine is a powerful chemical that can affect the respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, skin or cardiovascular system.
What Are the Symptoms of a Food Allergy?
Symptoms may appear almost immediately, or up to two hours after you've eaten the food. Symptoms can include a tingling sensation of the mouth, swelling of the tongue and throat, hives, skin rashes, vomiting, abdominal cramps, difficulty breathing, diarrhea, a drop in blood pressure, or even a loss of consciousness. Severe reactions -- called anaphylaxis -- can result in death.
Which Foods Most Often Cause Allergic Reactions?
There are six foods that cause over 90% of food allergies - milk, eggs, peanuts, wheat, soy, and tree nuts (such as walnuts, pecans and almonds).
How Are Food Allergies Diagnosed?
Your doctor may do a radioallergosorbent blood test (RAST) to check the number of antibodies produced by your immune system. Elevated levels of certain types of antibodies can help your doctor identify specific food allergies.
The doctor may also perform an allergy skin test, also called a scratch test, to identify the substances that are causing your allergy symptoms.
By keeping a food diary, your doctor will have a much better starting point to determine the foods that could trigger your allergies. You may be asked to eliminate all potentially allergenic foods and then add them back to your diet one at a time to see if they prompt any reaction. This is called an "elimination and challenge diet."
How Are Food Allergies Treated?
The best way to cope with a food allergy is to strictly avoid the foods that cause a reaction. Mild reactions often will subside without treatment. For rashes, skin creams may ease discomfort while antihistamines can help reduce itching and other symptoms.
For more serious reactions, corticosteroids such as prednisone will help to reduce swelling. In life-threatening situations, an epinephrine injection can immediately begin to reverse symptoms and is the only effective treatment option.
How Can I Be Prepared?
Once you and your doctor have determined which foods you should avoid, stay away from them. However, it is important that you maintain a healthy, nutritious diet. Ask your doctor to recommend foods that will provide you with the necessary nutrients.
You should also be aware of the ingredients in processed foods. Be sure to read labels. A registered dietitian can help you learn how to read food labels to discover hidden sources of food allergens.
If you are prone to allergic reactions, ask your doctor to prescribe an epinephrine injection kit and carry it with you at all times.
Next: Hay Fever
View the full table of contents for the Allergy Guide.
Reviewed by the doctors at The Cleveland Clinic Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine.Edited by Cynthia Haines, MD, WebMD, March 2006.
SOURCE: The Food Allergy and Anapylaxis Network
By MIKE STOBBE, Associated Press Writer 6 minutes ago
U.S. hospitals have saved an estimated 122,300 lives in the last 18 months through a massive campaign to reduce lethal errors, the leader of the national effort said Wednesday.
"I think this campaign signals no less than a new standard of health care in America," said Dr. Donald Berwick, a Harvard professor who organized the campaign.
About 3,100 hospitals participated in the project, sharing mortality data and carrying out study-tested procedures that prevent infections and mistakes. Experts say the cooperative effort was unusual for a competitive industry that traditionally doesn't like to publicly focus on patient-killing problems.
"We in health care have never seen or experienced anything like this," said Dr. Dennis O'Leary, president of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Berwick announced the campaign's results Wednesday morning at a hospital conference in Atlanta. O'Leary was one of hundreds of industry dignitaries and representatives in attendance.
Medical mistakes were the focus of a widely noted 1999 national report that estimated 44,000 to 98,000 Americans die each year as a result of errors and low-quality care.
That year, Berwick president of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, a Massachusetts-based nonprofit organization challenged health care leaders to improve care quality and prevent mistakes.
In December 2004, he stepped up the challenge by announcing a "100,000 Lives Campaign." He set a June 14, 2006, deadline to sign up at least 2,000 U.S. hospitals in the effort and implement six types of changes.
Perhaps the best known of the six changes was to deploy rapid response teams for emergency care of patients whose vital signs suddenly deteriorate.
Hospitals generally have teams that respond when patients develop sudden heart or breathing problems. That work is common in emergency departments. The measure was designed to make sure the service is available around-the-clock to other units, and to encourage lower-ranking medical staff members not to be intimidated about calling for help.
Another urged checks and rechecks of patient medications to protect against drug errors. A third focused on preventing surgical site infections by following certain guidelines, including giving patients antibiotics before their operations.
The hospitals also were asked to contribute monthly mortality data to Berwick's organization, which attempted to track the impact.
The effort was endorsed by federal health officials, health insurers, hospital industry leaders, the American Medical Association and others. About 3,100 hospitals signed up, representing about 75 percent of the nation's acute care beds.
About 86 percent sent in mortality data. Roughly a third said they were implementing all six measures, and more than half committed to at least three, Berwick said.
Campaign workers examined 2004 data for the participating hospitals to determine how many people were expected to die during the 18 months of the campaign.
They then checked the count of actual deaths reported. They also made mathematical adjustments for severity of illnesses and for volume of cases, to make a more fair comparison of the two time periods more fair. They also made estimates for participating hospitals that did not report data, Berwick said.
"This is estimation it isn't counting," he said.
Various estimates placed the number of saved lives at between 115,000 and 149,000, but the best guess was 122,342, he said.
Berwick challenged the hundreds of hospital representatives at the conference to continue to improve. He also proposed another goal all hospitals should implement all six changes by the beginning of 2007.