Honestmed
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
  Colon Screening Not Followed Up

Many Patients Not Receiving Follow-up Tests After Positive Screening For Colon Cancer

30 May 2006   

A UCLA/Veteran's Affairs study showed that more than 40 percent of patients who initially had received a positive result on a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) -- an initial screening tool for colon cancer -- did not receive appropriate diagnostic follow-up tests such as a colonoscopy or barium enema in 2002. According to the authors, the study may even underestimate this problem in the United States, since previous studies have shown the VA's level of preventive care and follow-up traditionally has been higher than at most other health care settings.

Published in May in the journal Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, the UCLA/VA study is one of the largest reviews of colorectal screening and follow-up patient data to date. The study used data from the VA, the nation's largest integrated health care system. The study was performed as a prelude to a national VA effort, now underway, to improve colorectal cancer screening and suggested the need for better medical follow-through for patients with potential colon cancer.

Study authors took advantage of the VA's ongoing quality improvement program to analyze 39,870 patient records. Overall, 61 percent of eligible VA patients had been screened for colorectal cancer, a rate significantly higher than the national average. Of the screened population, 313 patients had an abnormal FOBT result. Only 59 percent, or 185 patients, of this group received follow-up diagnostic tests such as a colonoscopy or a barium enema. Forty-one percent, or 128 patients, received no follow-up at all in the six months following the FOBT.

"As a nation, we are getting better in providing colorectal cancer screening, but we need to do a much better job in following-up with diagnostic tests for those patients who have abnormal screening results," said Dr. David A. Etzioni, principal investigator and a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar in the Division of General Surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

The authors believe that the study has implications for how health care systems monitor their own quality. "Any healthcare system that provides cancer screening programs needs to track each step in the screening process," Etzioni said. "Many patients were not offered any kind of total colon examination after having a positive screening for colon cancer. Traditionally, quality-of-care assessments just look at initial screening rates for colon cancer, but this study reveals that efforts should focus on the entire diagnostic process to help ensure that patients don't slip through cracks in the system."

In the study, researchers identified several possible factors why patients didn't receive follow-up tests. Fifteen percent of the patients who did not receive follow-up did not have a primary care visit in the six months after the positive FOBT screening. The remaining patients in this group saw a primary care physician but were not referred for a follow-up colonoscopy. For those who did receive follow-up tests, there was a long period between having a positive FOBT to receiving a colonoscopy (250 days) or barium enema (120 days).

"These findings have helped the VA identify key issues to spur more timely follow-up testing, and other systems around the country might do the same" Etzioni said.

Potential solutions include educating patients to advocate for screening and follow-up, and putting electronic systems in place to track follow-up.

The study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program; the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development; and the National Cancer Institute Colorectal Cancer Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Service Directed Project.

Other study authors include: Elizabeth M. Yano, Dr. Lisa V. Rubenstein, Martin L. Lee, Dr. Clifford Y. Ko, Robert H. Brook, Patricia H. Parkerton and Dr. Steven M. Asch, all from UCLA.

Rachel Champeau
rchampeau@mednet.ucla.edu
University of California - Los Angeles
http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu
 
  Canadians Healthier?
Study: Canadians healthier than Americans

By MIKE STOBBE, Associated Press Writer 13 minutes ago

You can add Canadians to the list of foreigners who are healthier than Americans. Americans are 42 percent more likely than Canadians to have diabetes, 32 percent more likely to have high blood pressure, and 12 percent more likely to have arthritis, Harvard Medical School researchers found. That is according to a survey in which American and Canadian adults were asked over the telephone about their health.

The study comes less than a month after other researchers reported that middle-aged, white Americans are much sicker than their counterparts in England.

"We're really falling behind other nations," said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a co-author of the Canadian study.

Canada's national health insurance program is at least part of the reason for the differences found in the study, Woolhandler said. Universal coverage makes it easier for more Canadians to get disease-preventing health services, she said.

James Smith, a RAND Corp. researcher who co-authored the American-English study, disagreed. His research found that England's national health insurance program did not explain the difference in disease rates, because even Americans with insurance were in worse health.

"To me, that's unlikely," he said of the idea that universal coverage explains international differences.

Woolhandler said her findings were different in at least one important respect: In the Canadian study, insured Americans and Canadians had about the same rates of disease. It was the uninsured Americans who made the overall U.S. figures worse, she said.

The study, released Tuesday, is being published in the American Journal of Public Health. It is based on a telephone survey of about 3,500 Canadians and 5,200 U.S. residents in 2002-03. Those surveyed were 18 or older.

The results are based on what those surveyed said about their health. In contrast, the researchers in the American-English study surveyed participants and also examined people and conducted laboratory tests on them.

The new study found that 6.7 percent of Americans and 4.7 percent of Canadians reported having diabetes; 18.3 percent and 13.9 percent, respectively, reported having high blood pressure; and 17.9 percent and 16.0 percent said they had arthritis. The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those difference were too small to be statistically significant.

About 21 percent of Americans said they were obese, compared with 15 percent of Canadians. And about 13.5 percent of the Americans admitted to a sedentary lifestyle, versus 6.5 percent of Canadians. However, more Canadians were smokers — 19 percent, compared with about 17 percent of Americans.

About 42 percent of the Americans rated their quality of health care as excellent, while 39 percent of Canadians did.

Also, 92 percent of American women said they had a Pap test within the last five years, while 83 percent of Canadian women had. But Canadians have lower death rates from cervical cancer. "It's a little hard to interpret," Woolhandler said.

One more plus for the Americans: Fewer than 1 percent said they were unable to get needed care because of long waits, compared with 3.5 percent of Canadians.

However, about 80 percent of Americans had a regular doctor, while 85 percent of Canadians did. And nearly twice as many Americans said there were medicines they needed but couldn't afford (9.9 percent versus 5.1 percent).

 
  New Yorkers Demand Fair Share Health Care
New Yorkers Demand Fair Share Health Care
Posted By Mike Hall On 25th May 2006 @ 16:29 In Legislation & Politics, In the States

“No employee of a multi-billion dollar corporation should be forced to go without medical care.”

That’s what the t-shirts said on more than 400 New Yorkers who told lawmakers at a special State Assembly hearing May 23 in Albany to pass Fair Share Health Care legislation.

Fair Share legislation and initiatives, which the AFL-CIO, unions and health care advocates are pushing in more than 30 states, would ensure that the largest corporations like Wal-Mart stop shifting health care insurance costs to workers, taxpayers and other businesses. In general, the initiatives require large, profitable companies to spend a percentage of their payroll ...

Article taken from AFL-CIO Weblog - http://blog.aflcio.org
URL to article: http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/05/25/new-yorkers-demand-fair-share-health-care/

 

ARCHIVES
03/24/06 / 03/25/06 / 03/28/06 / 03/29/06 / 03/30/06 / 03/31/06 / 04/04/06 / 04/05/06 / 04/07/06 / 04/08/06 / 04/10/06 / 04/11/06 / 04/12/06 / 04/13/06 / 04/14/06 / 04/15/06 / 04/16/06 / 04/17/06 / 04/18/06 / 04/20/06 / 04/21/06 / 04/26/06 / 04/27/06 / 04/28/06 / 05/01/06 / 05/02/06 / 05/03/06 / 05/04/06 / 05/05/06 / 05/08/06 / 05/09/06 / 05/17/06 / 05/18/06 / 05/19/06 / 05/30/06 / 05/31/06 / 06/01/06 / 06/02/06 / 06/03/06 / 06/07/06 / 06/08/06 / 06/09/06 / 06/14/06 / 06/15/06 / 06/20/06 / 06/22/06 / 06/26/06 / 06/27/06 / 06/29/06 / 07/01/06 / 07/07/06 / 07/10/06 / 07/13/06 / 07/15/06 / 07/18/06 / 07/21/06 / 07/24/06 / 07/29/06 / 07/31/06 / 08/02/06 / 08/04/06 / 08/30/06 / 09/13/06 / 09/14/06 / 09/21/06 / 09/26/06 / 09/27/06 / 10/01/06 / 10/02/06 / 10/05/06 / 10/06/06 / 10/09/06 / 10/11/06 / 10/16/06 / 10/17/06 / 10/18/06 / 10/23/06 / 10/24/06 / 10/27/06 / 11/09/06 / 11/10/06 / 01/03/07 / 01/16/07 / 01/17/07 / 01/19/07 / 01/29/07 / 02/12/07 / 02/28/07 / 03/16/07 / 05/01/07 / 05/02/07 / 11/18/07 / 05/15/08 / 05/26/08 /


Powered by Blogger